The wicketkeeper who bats, and the batter who keeps

Selecting a keeper for runs works right up until the moment it does not.

1 MIN READ 0 comments
The wicketkeeper who bats, and the batter who keeps

Demo Content. This article is placeholder copy written to fill the template. The scores, quotes and events described here are illustrative and did not happen.

A dropped catch behind the stumps costs more than a low score, and it happens in front of everybody.

Counting what a keeper prevents

Byes conceded and chances missed are the only statistics most people see. Neither captures the leg-side take standing up, or the throw collected cleanly with the batter half a yard short.

The key points

  • Standing back to seam hides most keeping weaknesses
  • Standing up to spin exposes all of them
  • Byes are a poor proxy for keeping quality

When the trade-off is worth it

On flat surfaces, with the keeper standing back, a batting keeper costs very little and adds a great deal. On a turning pitch, standing up to spin, the arithmetic reverses entirely.

More coverage of this story, and of everything else happening in the world of cricket, is published in our news section as it develops.

What did you think of this article?

Pick one reaction. You can change it at any time.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your comment will appear after moderation. Your email address is never published, and links are not allowed.

Never shown publicly.